Ask any seasoned investor what rattles markets the most, and they’ll likely say it's not recessions, rising interest rates, or even war; it’s uncertainty. That grey zone where possibilities are many, probabilities are unclear, and decisions feel like guesswork. The market can price risk, but what it can't price is the “not knowing”.

 

Welcome to the most dangerous force in investing: the unknown.

 

The unquantifiable threat

 

Bad news can be priced. Investors can recalibrate models, shift portfolios, and assess valuation impacts when inflation or interest rates are rising. There's a framework, a reference point, and a known set of consequences.

 

Uncertainty, on the other hand, offers no such structure. It's open-ended, breeding narrative over analysis and panic over planning. In volatile times like 2025 - where global elections, AI regulation, and geopolitical tensions compete for attention - markets aren’t waiting for facts. They’re reacting to fog.

 

The issue isn’t the presence of risk. It's the absence of clarity. Markets can digest data, even unpleasant data. What throws them into disarray is a vacuum of information, where every opinion sounds like insight and every headline feels like a warning.

 

The psychology behind the panic

 

This isn't just about economics; it's human nature. Behavioural finance tells us that people suffer from ambiguity aversion. A preference for known risks over unknown ones, even when the known ones are objectively worse. It's why people fear flying more than driving and why investors sometimes sell solid assets just because they're unsure what might come next.

 

This also explains why a disappointing earnings result may cause less damage than a vague corporate statement hinting at “strategic headwinds”. Investors can accept pain; they just hate not knowing where it’s coming from, how long it will last, or what the worst-case scenario might be.

 

Case Study 1: COVID-19 (2020)

 

In February 2020, global markets didn't collapse because of infection rates or hospital data; they collapsed because nobody knew what was coming. Would cities shut down? Would global trade freeze? Would governments respond with fiscal rescue or chaos?

 

Markets priced in the apocalypse because there was no precedent. Ironically, markets stabilised once the data started flowing and central banks stepped in. Certainty, even of a bad situation, was preferable to limbo. It wasn’t the virus that crashed the markets. It was the information gap around it.

 

Case Study 2: Brexit (2016)

 

This is another prime example: the lead-up to the UK’s Brexit vote. In the months before the referendum, markets grew increasingly volatile. Why? It was simple: a binary outcome with no post-exit roadmap creates deep uncertainty.

 

Yet when Leave won the vote, markets corrected sharply and found their footing. Over the following weeks, despite political confusion, risk assets rebounded. The facts, however unwelcome, had arrived; the market could work with that. Uncertainty creates paralysis, but clarity - even if painful - restores function.

 

What investors do under uncertainty

 

When faced with the unknown, investors often make three classic mistakes:

 

· They overreact – selling risk assets even when fundamentals don’t justify it.

· They shorten time horizons – abandoning long-term plans for short-term protection.

· They misprice worst-case scenarios – building portfolios around events that may never materialise.

 

This emotional reaction is costly in theory and shows up in performance. Behavioural studies consistently show that investor returns lag market returns by a wide margin. The gap is often explained by panic selling and poor timing decisions driven by uncertainty.

 

Why it matters now

 

In 2025, the fog is back; from central bank guidance and AI regulation to global elections, climate shifts, and trade tensions, the list of unknowns is long and growing. While headline-driven reactions are understandable, they’re also dangerous.

 

This is why seasoned investors anchor decisions in frameworks, scenario modelling, asset allocation bands, and disciplined rebalancing. They don't wait for certainty but don't let confusion dictate their process either. They understand that uncertainty is a constant, and that’s precisely why strategy must be consistent.

 

Conclusion: Uncertainty is inevitable, panic is optional

 

Markets can cope with bad news, what they struggle with is indecision, inconsistency, and narrative chaos. For investors, the challenge isn’t predicting outcomes; it’s remaining disciplined when others are paralysed by the unknown.

 

The real test of investment resilience is not what you do when you know but how you behave when you don’t. Don’t fear uncertainty; plan for it. It's not volatility or recession that derails portfolios. It’s guessing in the dark and forgetting there’s a light switch.

 

#InvestorMindset #BehaviouralFinance #MarketVolatility

Back to News