South Korea’s equity markets are back in the spotlight. With the Kospi up more than 40% year-to-date and over $11 billion in net foreign inflows since May alone, investors are starting to believe the unthinkable: the long-maligned “Korea discount” might finally be closing.

 

The trigger? A government-led push to improve South Korea’s poor track record on corporate governance and shareholder rights, long-standing friction points for global capital allocators. It’s not the first time we’ve heard promises of reform, but this time the market is behaving as if the momentum is real.

 

Is it? Or are investors once again chasing a headline-driven rally with limited staying power?

 

The Korea discount: A persistent drag, slowly narrowing

 

For decades, Korean equities have traded at a discount to their book value, earnings, and global peers. This was primarily due to opaque ownership structures, weak minority protections, and the dominance of family-run conglomerates, commonly referred to as chaebols. The market’s structural inefficiencies, while frustrating, have historically kept valuation screens lit up.

 

But this year, the tide appears to be shifting. According to CLSA, the average discount to net asset value at large conglomerates has narrowed from 57% earlier this year to around 43%. This tightening reflects growing investor conviction that political capital is finally being spent on meaningful reform.

 

Real reform or cosmetic fixes?

 

The most concrete progress occurred in July, when the government extended the fiduciary duty of directors to minority shareholders, a long-overdue alignment of boardroom interests. Additional proposals rumoured to be on the table include:

 

· Forced cancellation of treasury shares, long used by controlling families to shield themselves from dilution.

· Mandatory tender offers to protect minority investors during takeovers.

· Tax reforms to remove incentives that encourage artificially low valuations.

 

However, the backlash has already begun. Business groups are lobbying aggressively to dilute the treasury share reforms, claiming it would leave companies vulnerable to hostile foreign takeovers. It’s a classic emerging market tug-of-war between reformist intent and entrenched interests.

 

Case in point: LG’s stock surged after announcing plans to retire all treasury shares by 2025. In contrast, KCC’s shares fell 12% when it revealed it would cancel only a small portion. The message from the market is clear: talk is no longer enough. Investors want execution.

 

Drawing parallels with Japan: Hope, with caveats

 

Many global funds are asking the obvious question: Is South Korea today where Japan was a decade ago?

 

Japan’s journey, from a chronically undervalued market to one enjoying record foreign flows and corporate buybacks, has become a template for patient governance-focused investing. South Korea’s path may be similar, but the terrain is arguably rougher.

 

Unlike Japan, where reform was aided by a shrinking but cooperative corporate base, South Korea’s chaebols are more complex, and the political incentives are less aligned. Korean tax law still rewards low valuations, and succession issues in family-led firms continue to cloud governance decisions.

 

As UK hedge fund Asset Value Investors recently commented: “The road to governance reform is long and winding.” The key will be policy durability - not just headline ambition.

 

Portfolio implications: Cautious optimism warranted

 

For global investors, South Korea now represents one of the more compelling selective equity opportunities in the region. But it’s not a beta play, it’s alpha.

 

This is not a market-wide rerating story (yet). It’s a stock picker’s market, where reform execution, governance alignment, and capital return policy will increasingly separate the winners from the laggards.

 

Some themes worth watching:

 

· Capital return catalysts: Look for companies that proactively retire treasury shares or introduce clear shareholder return policies.

· M&A activity: Governance reform could pave the way for increased domestic consolidation or foreign strategic interest.

· Regulatory tailwinds: Monitor how deeply the proposed reforms are enacted - particularly in tax code adjustments and shareholder protections.

 

Final Word: The opportunity is real, but so are the risks

 

South Korea may indeed be at a governance inflexion point, echoing Japan’s decade-long transformation. However, let’s not forget: this is still an emerging market narrative unfolding within a developed market framework.

 

The potential upside is significant, particularly if reforms unlock capital efficiency and close NAV discounts. But so too are the political risks, implementation delays, and corporate resistance.

 

As with all structural themes, success lies not in the story but in the substance. This time might be different, but smart investors will watch policy signals, not just price charts, to judge whether South Korea is truly ready for its re-rating moment.

 

#APACInvesting #KoreaMarkets

Back to News