We know that the financial market moves at a lightning-fast pace, but even the portfolio puzzle isn’t what it used to be.

In an era where headlines shift faster than fundamentals, the modern investor faces a new imperative: return diversity. The old 60/40 model may have provided comfort in its simplicity, but today's environment of higher volatility, shifting rate cycles, and geopolitical complexity demands more nuanced thinking.

For high-net-worth individuals in Hong Kong and across Asia, the question is no longer “what will go up?” but rather “what will behave differently?”

The answer lies in striking the right balance between correlated and uncorrelated returns - a strategy that demands both breadth and depth.

 

Why correlation still has a role

Let’s start with the obvious: correlated assets - like equities across global markets - still offer compounding potential, especially when underpinned by strong growth or sector tailwinds. Tactical exposure to technology, infrastructure, or even regional indices can provide clear participation in upward momentum.

In Asia, this might look like structured equity plays in Japan’s automation boom, or thematic baskets tied to China’s AI resurgence. Even emerging names in ASEAN’s digital buildout offer moments of synchronised risk-on movement. These ideas move with the market, and when they work, they amplify.

But herein lies the danger: when everything moves together, risk becomes systemic. And in down markets, correlation can quickly turn from friend to foe.

 

The case for uncorrelated strategies

This is where uncorrelated strategies earn their keep.

Think of gold, volatility-linked instruments, or spread trades in futures and options. These are not designed to outperform in bull runs, but to protect capital and stabilise returns across cycles. For some GIS clients, this might mean pairing a high-growth pre-IPO position with a defensive options hedge, or using cash-like positions for optionality amid macro uncertainty.

Other examples include macro funds, market-neutral equity strategies, or real asset allocations that move independently of equity beta. The key is not avoiding risk but managing how and where it shows up.

 

Blending the two: The professional edge

Sophisticated portfolios rarely take an all-or-nothing approach. Instead, they blend return streams, matching high-beta conviction plays with insurance-like instruments that protect or diversify outcomes.

At GIS, many clients use this framework to gain early access to small-cap resource names while simultaneously holding exposure to global fixed income, commodities, or index puts. The effect isn’t just about smoothing volatility; it’s about ensuring that opportunities can be acted on regardless of broader market direction.

Importantly, GIS’s multi-asset access and execution-first model allows for real-time portfolio adjustments. Whether through direct market access (DMA), pre-IPO structuring, or futures overlays, the ability to pivot is built into the service model. For the active HNWI, this is not really an option; it’s a strategic necessity.

 

Conclusion: Correlation is not the enemy - complacency is

In today’s markets, intelligent diversification isn’t about spreading thin, it’s about selecting assets that behave differently for reasons you understand.

Correlated returns still drive growth, but they must be offset by strategic layers that are uncorrelated. The result is not just performance, but resilience.

For GIS clients in Hong Kong and beyond, the portfolio challenge is no longer just about access. It’s about alignment. With risk, with opportunity, and with the need to stay liquid and ready for what’s next.

The future doesn’t always reward prediction, but it consistently rewards preparation. For informed investors, building with both correlation and contrast can feel overly cautious at times, but that caution proves its worth in moments of volatility. When markets move unexpectedly, this layered approach is often what separates resilience from regret.

Back to News